Norfolk Dredging Co. v. Wiley
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
KELLEY, District Judge.
Seamen who are injured while in service of a vessel are entitled to have the shipowner pay maintenance (financial support) and cure (medical expenses). Calmar S.S. Corp. v. Taylor, 303 U.S. 525, 527-28, 58 S.Ct. 651, 82 L.Ed. 993 (1938). The shipowner’s obligation lasts until such time as the seaman reaches maximum medical improvement (“MMI”). Id. at 527-28, 58 S.Ct. 651; see also Fitzgerald v. U.S. Lines Co., 374 U.S. 16, 20 n. 7, 83 S.Ct. 1646, 10 L.Ed.2d 720 (1963); Salem v. United States, 370 U.S. 31, 38, 82 S.Ct. 1119, 8 L.Ed.2d 313 (1962); Vaughan…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Saco v. Tug Tucana Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Baucom v. Sisco Stevedoring, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
- Stemmle v. Interlake Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022