Legal Opinion

Norfolk Dredging Co. v. Wiley

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 29, 2006No. Civil Action 2:05CV92PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

KELLEY, District Judge.

Seamen who are injured while in service of a vessel are entitled to have the shipowner pay maintenance (financial support) and cure (medical expenses). Calmar S.S. Corp. v. Taylor, 303 U.S. 525, 527-28, 58 S.Ct. 651, 82 L.Ed. 993 (1938). The shipowner’s obligation lasts until such time as the seaman reaches maximum medical improvement (“MMI”). Id. at 527-28, 58 S.Ct. 651; see also Fitzgerald v. U.S. Lines Co., 374 U.S. 16, 20 n. 7, 83 S.Ct. 1646, 10 L.Ed.2d 720 (1963); Salem v. United States, 370 U.S. 31, 38, 82 S.Ct. 1119, 8 L.Ed.2d 313 (1962); Vaughan…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saco v. Tug Tucana Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  2. Baucom v. Sisco Stevedoring, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
  3. Stemmle v. Interlake Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API