Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Reynolds

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 29, 2022No. 3:21-cv-05077Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:21-cv-05077-MDH ) DAVID REYNOLDS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Judgement (“Plaintiff’s Motion”) (Doc. 66) and David Reynolds, Amanda Reynolds, J.R., and J.R.’s (“Reynolds Defendants”) Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement. (Doc. 67). The parties have fully briefed issues raised in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Quinn v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Conagra, Inc., Doing Business as Northwest Fabrics & CraftsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API