Legal Opinion

Kayler v. Gallimore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1967No. 537PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The fact that Kayler was at one time a party to the suit between Stewart and Gallimore has no present significance. He was dismissed from that suit prior to the entry of the judgment upon which he now relies. The effect of that judgment upon the present action is, therefore, to be determined as if Kayler had never been made a party to the Stewart case. Bank v. Casualty Co., 268 N.C. 234, 150 S.E. 2d 396. It is also immaterial to the determination of the question now before us that Kayler was a witness in the trial of the action brought by Stewart. Idem; Meacham v. Larus & Brothers Co., 212…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Leary v. . Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Thompson v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Goetz v. Board of Trustees, Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Girard Trust Bank v. BelkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Gregory v. PenlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Tar Landing Villas Owners' Ass'n v. Town of Atlantic BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API