Girard Trust Bank v. Belk
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff’s Appeal
Plaintiff assigns error to the entry of summary judgment dismissing defendants Belk and Henderson Belk Enterprises, Inc. Plaintiff’s primary contention is “that the circumstantial evidence that Belk was a party to the fraud is overwhelming.” Furthermore, plaintiff cites Temel-Peck’s indebtedness to Belk as a motive for the alleged scheme, Belk’s control of the corporations as the opportunity to perpetrate the fraud, along with the knowing acceptance of the benefits of the fraudulent transaction, failure to make an investigation of the transaction…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Canady v. MannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Leftwich v. GainesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Burrow v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Bolick v. Townsend Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.