Legal Opinion

Bay County Prosecutor v. Nugent

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 2007No. Docket No. 267069PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint to revoke defendant’s acknowledgment of parentage. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

On June 25, 2004, Amy Dyjak gave birth to a son. Dyjak was dating defendant Richard A. Nugent, who was married but in the process of seeking a divorce. Defendant signed an affidavit of parentage acknowledging his paternity of Dyjak’s son. Defendant had undergone a vasectomy three to four years before the child was conceived; however, he believed that he could be the child’s biological father…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Tryc v Michigan Veterans’ FacilityMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Powerpick Player's Club of Michigan, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. McLean v. McElhaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. People v. MaloneMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Rogers v. WciselMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Helton v. BeamanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API