Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Wcisel
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 2015No. Docket 318395PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
Defendant appeals by delayed leave granted the circuit court order denying his motion to revoke his acknowledgment of parentage. We reverse and remand.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Shana J. Rogers, and defendant, David A. Wcisel, began an “off and on” dating relationship in 2006. On March 12, 2007, plaintiff gave birth to MW. Defendant was present for the delivery of MW and signed an acknowledgment of parentage at the hospital. Plaintiff and defendant continued to reside together for approximately one year after MW’s birth before they separated and defendant left the residence. On July 3, 2008,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coblentz v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. TennysonMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Draprop Corp. v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Malek Hmeidan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jason Ross Kalin v. Paige Katherine FlemingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Anne Marie Hazen v. Kevin Anthony PhillisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Beth Bauer v. County of SaginawMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Dillon Michael Blain v. Brittney Marie EhlertMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.