Legal Opinion

People v. Schwartzman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1969PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding *915thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant contended that the District Attorney’s cross-examination of him and admission of evidence of uncharged crimes denied defendant a fair trial and due process of law in violation of his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals considered this question and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. GostonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. People v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. HardisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API