People v. Carney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court’s Sandoval ruling was erroneous. We disagree. The court properly permitted defendant to be impeached with four of his 10 prior convictions (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 459; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292; People v Patterson, 88 AD2d 694, affd 59 NY2d 794). The court properly balanced the appropriate factors in determining that the probative value of the four convictions, all of which demonstrate the willingness of defendant to place his interests above those of society, outweighed their prejudicial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. KeindlNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Shawn X.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. RibackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. PritchettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. ZuritaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.