Henley's Wholesale Meats, Inc. v. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Judge.
The primary question in this case is whether the trial judge, sitting without a jury, properly directed a verdict for the appellee at the conclusion of the appellant’s case. Appellant, Henley’s Wholesale Meats,'Inc. (Henley), contends on appeal that it made a prima facie case of misrepresentation against Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. (Bennett), and Bennett, therefore, was required to present evidence to overcome Henley’s case. Bennett counters this contention, arguing it was entitled to the directed verdict because Henley never offered competent proof that a false material…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Werbe v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Miskimins v. City National Bank of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Fausett & Co. v. BullardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Ralston Purina Co. v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Minton v. McGowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Camp v. First Federal Savings & LoanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Bio-Tech Pharmacal, Inc. v. International Business Connections, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Security Insurance Corp. of Hartford v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Suzuki of Russellville, Inc. v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
- Stephens v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.