Legal Opinion

Dickhaut v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 1, 1897PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal as upon writ of error from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City (Wickes, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The defendant was indicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore City on the charge of having violated sec. 13 of Art. 99 of the Code, as amended by the Act of 1894. The only allegation in the indictment is, that the defendant on the 24th October, 1896 — being a time within the prohibition of the statute — had in his possession ninety-six rabbits, contrary to the form of the Act of Assembly, &c., &c. To this indictment the defendant demurred, and his demurrer was overruled. He then filed a motion to quash the indictment *460based upon the ground, first, that the statute is intended to apply only to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cearfoss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  2. Parkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  3. Commonwealth v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Mincher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stevens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  2. State v. PetrushanskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. White v. PentonSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. State v. CoblentzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  5. State v. SchumanOregon Supreme Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API