Legal Opinion

Stevens v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 5, 1899PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore (Sharp, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtSchmucker, J.

The appellant was indicted for having in his possession and exposing for sale in Baltimore City, during the closed season, certain dead rabbits, contrary to the provisions of section 15Í’, of chapter 206, of the Acts of 1898. He first filed a demurrer to the indictment, which was overruled, and then pleaded npn cul. and elected to be tried before the Court.

At the trial of the case he offered to prove that the rabbits mentioned in the indictment had been lawfully killed in another State of the Union, and had been shipped to him from that State in an original package, and that he had received…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Hall v. DeCuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Phelps v. . RaceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Salsburg v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Neuenschwander v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Harper v. GallowaySupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  5. Wentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API