Legal Opinion
Pennamco, Inc. v. Nardo Management Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided July 3, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’HARA, Judge.
Pennamco, Inc. (“Pennamco”) has instituted a scire facias sur mortgage foreclosure on a construction loan mortgage. During the pendency of motions to dismiss and for entry of judgment, petitioners, JR & S Associates (“JR & S”) and John Julian Construction Co. (“Julian”), filed a joint motion to intervene under Superior Court Civil Rule 24(a)(2). JR & S, a subordinate mortgagee, alleges that violations by Pennamco of certain commitments in related mortgage documents invalidated a subordination agreement, making its lien prior to Pen-namco’s; Julian, a contractor, also alleges *728viol…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gordy v. Preform Building Components, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
- Peterson v. Miller Rubber Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Stockman v. McKeeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
- Weinberger v. GoldsteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Philadelphia v. Damnco Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Asbestos LitigationSuperior Court of Delaware · 2006
- Wolhar v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1997
- In Re AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. Stockholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2023