Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Miller Rubber Co. of New York
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 25, 1928No. 7690PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in error seek reversal of a judgment in the sum of $10,000 recovered against them as sureties or guarantors by defendant in error in the trial court. Plaintiffs in error and another were defendants below, and defendant in error was plaintiff, and the parties will be so designated in this opinion.
The style of the action was “Miller Rubber Company of New York, a Corporation, v. F. W. Abbott Company, a Corporation, and E. G. Peterson and F. W. Abbott, defendants.” F. W. Abbott Company did not join in the application for writ of error, nor did it sue out such a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Transcontinental Petroleum Co. v. Interocean Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Houck v. FrisbeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
- MacDonald v. WolffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Western Advertising Co. v. Star Publishing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
3Cited by28 opinions
- Trans-Bay Engineers and Builders, Inc. v. Carla A. Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Commercial Nat. Bank v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- United States v. Julius C. Immordino and Joanne Immordino, and Third-Party v. Joseph C. Costa, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Housing Mortgage Corp. v. Allied Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.