Legal Opinion
Gateway, Kelso & Co. v. West Hartford No. 1, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 15, 2011No. AC 31374PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The defendant, West Hartford No. 1, LLC, appeals from the denial of its motion for summary judgment, which asserted that the doctrine of collateral estoppel barred the action brought by the plaintiff, Gateway, Kelso & Company, Inc. The issue presented in this appeal is whether a factual finding made in a prejudgment remedy proceeding may be accorded collateral estoppel effect in a subsequent proceeding on the merits. Because we conclude that it may not, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our review of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Powell v. Infinity InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- SS-II, LLC v. Bridge Street AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Busconi v. DighelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- NIPMUC PROPERTIES, LLC v. City of MeridenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Deutsche Bank AG v. Sebastian Holdings, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Luongo Construction & Development, LLC v. MacFarlaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- GATEWAY, KELSO AND COMPANY, INC. v. West Hartford No. 1, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Gateway, Kelso & Co. v. West Hartford No. 1, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.