Legal Opinion
NIPMUC PROPERTIES, LLC v. City of Meriden
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 23, 2011No. AC 32313PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEAR, J.
The plaintiffs, Nipmuc Properties, LLC (Nipmuc), and Summitwood Development, LLC (Summitwood), appeal from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant city of Meriden in their action to quiet title to a fifty-two acre parcel of land 1 owned by the defendant, in which Nipmuc asserts a leasehold interest. 2 On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly applied the doctrine of res judicata to bar their action. Because we agree with the defendant that the plaintiffs’ claims in this litigation are barred by the doctrine of res…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Powell v. Infinity InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- White v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Carabetta Organization, Ltd. v. MeridenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- In re Probate Appeal of Cadle Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Mierzejewski v. BrownellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. Bacon Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015