Legal Opinion
Ermola v. Hudson Paint and Varnish Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 30, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
70 N.J. Super. 76 (1961)
174 A.2d 759
ELIZABETH ERMOLA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE HUDSON PAINT AND VARNISH CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court, Law Division.
Decided June 30, 1961.
Mr. Samuel E. Bass for the petitioner (Mr. Fred Freeman, attorney).
Mr. John W. Taylor for the respondent.
YANCEY, J.C.C.
The petitioner is the widow of decedent, who was an employee of respondent The Hudson Paint and Varnish Co. The decedent was last employed on December 17, 1952 as a varnish cook, in which work he handled various chemicals and oils which caused him to be exposed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eckert v. New Jersey State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Preveslin v. Derby & Ansonia Developing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Gregutis v. Waclark Wire WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Biglioli v. Durotest Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Hansen v. Brann & Stewart Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McAllister v. Bd. of Ed., KearnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963