Legal Opinion

Haas v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 24, 2008No. 07-1198-cvPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Jason Haas appeals from a judgment entered in the Northern District of New York (Lawrence E. Kahn, Judge) granting summary judgment to *85Defendant-Appellee Delaware & Hudson Railway Company, Inc. (“D&H”).

Haas, a D&H employee, brought suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, alleging that he injured his shoulder operating a rail switch on May 1, 2004. In granting D&H’s motion for summary judgment, the District Court struck the affidavit of Gary Sheehan for reasons discussed below, and held that the record did not include…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Design Strategy, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Patterson v. BalsamicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Vito Tufariello v. Long Island Railroad Company, Docket No. 05-1945-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Ebewo v. MartinezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  5. Philip A. Syverson v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Chen v. New Trend Apparel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Lujan v. Cabana Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. Preuss v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Charles v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. In re Puda Coal Securities Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API