Legal Opinion

Philip A. Syverson v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 25, 1994No. 820, Docket 93-7710PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Philip Syverson brought an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 (1986), charging that allegedly unsafe conditions at his employer’s railyard contributed to an incident in which Syverson, sitting in his parked car, was attacked by a knife-wielding stranger. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Syverson’s employer, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”), holding that a sudden violent attack by a crazed trespasser was inherently unforeseeable, and that Conrail could not be deemed negligent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Miner v. City of Glens FallsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. Richard Gallose v. Long Island Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Burns v. Penn Central Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Terminate Control Corp. v. HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. Cecilio B. Williams v. The Long Island Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Haas v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Lisa M. Nelson v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API