Legal Opinion
Preuss v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 4, 2013No. 10-CV-6375 (CS)PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SEIBEL, District Judge.
Before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Kolmar Laboratories, Inc., (Doc. 45), and the Cross-Motion of Plaintiffs William Preuss, (“Preuss”), Robert Bloomer (“Bloomer”), and Francis Xavier Cañero (“Cañero”), (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) to preclude certain affirmations submitted by Defendant, (Doc. 55). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I. Motion to Strike
In support of its Motion…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In Re Veritas Software Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lisa Olivarez v. GEO Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Equal Opprtunity Employment Commission v. United Health Programs of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Siuzdak v. SessionsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Aiola v. Malverne Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.