Legal Opinion

Duryea v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 1, 2006No. 33498-4-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, J.

¶1 Michael Wilson appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to vacate a default judgment obtained by Brett and Michelle Duryea. Because the trial court entered the default order and judgment when Wilson was not in default, we reverse.

FACTS

¶2 Wilson and Brett Duryea were co-owners of a business, Absolute Marble & Tile, Inc.1 For reasons that are disputed, the business foundered. Duryea sued Wilson, claiming that Wilson had contracted to replace Duryea as personal guarantor of Absolute’s debts and to indemnify Duryea in exchange for Duryea’s shares of stock but had failed to do so,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. White v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tiffin v. HendricksWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Showalter v. OatsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Johnson v. Cash StoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Johnson v. Cash StoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duryea v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Kimberly Gale v. C & K Remodel, Inc, Westco Insurance CoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Mustafa Idris v. Girma Ayele And Jane Doe AyeleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Paul Thomas Crews v. Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API