Legal Opinion

Showalter v. Oats

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 26, 2004No. 30998-0-IIPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Van Deren, J.

— Cheryl Showalter appeals the trial court’s order vacating her default judgment against Wild Oats Markets, Inc. (Wild Oats), on her personal injury claim. Showalter contends that the trial court erred because Wild Oats’ motion to set aside the default judgment failed to demonstrate a prima facie defense and excusable neglect. Holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion under the facts here, we affirm.

FACTS

¶2 Showalter filed a personal injury complaint against Wild Oats in April 2003. Wild Oats has retail grocery stores in 23 states, including Nature’s Marketplace…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. White v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Pimentel v. Roundup CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hwang v. McMahillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Hwang v. McMahillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Little v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Showalter v. Wild OatsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. TMT Bear Creek Shopping Center, Inc. v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Smith v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Ha v. Signal Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API