Legal Opinion

Mustafa Idris v. Girma Ayele And Jane Doe Ayele

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 5, 2019No. 78145-6Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MUSTAFA IDRIS, No. 78145-6 Respondent, DIVISION ONE V. GENESIS CHIROPRACTIC GROUP L.L.C., a Washington State Corporation, and MASUD HASAN and JANE DOE UNPUBLISHED OPINION HASAN, Defendants, GIRMA AYELE and JANE DOE AYELE, Appellants. FILED: August 5, 2019 ANDRUS, J. — Girma Ayele appeals a default judgment entered against him. He contends the trial court failed to properly apply CR 60 when it denied his motion to vacate an order of default. Although Ayele, who is representing himself in this appeal, has cited the incorrect court rule…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. White v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Right-Price Recreation, L.L.C. v. Connells Prairie Community CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Right-Price Recreation v. Connells PrairieWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API