Legal Opinion

Bruhn v. Norris

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1901No. 3617PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William Hickman Moore, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fullerton, J.

Briefly stated, the facts of this case are these: In 1898 the appellants were the owners of lot 8, in block 42, in A. A. Denny’s Addition to the city of Seattle, on which there was a mortgage for $3,900, held by the respondent, which the appellants had assumed and were obligated to pay. In April of that year the city of Seattle, pursuant to ordinances theretofore passed, commenced work regrading the street in -front of and abutting upon the lot, completing the same on August 15th of the same year. On October 25th following, the city…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. LoebIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. King v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Milwaukee & Northern Railroad v. StrangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Porter v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Schaefer v. E. F. Gregory Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Gillam v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. City of Seattle v. FenderWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Yesler Logging Co. v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API