Legal Opinion

Moundridge Milling Co. v. Cream of Wheat Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1939No. 1809PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Under a contract1 dated January 30, 1935, the Moundridge Milling Company2 sold and agreed to deliver to the Cream of Wheat Corporation3 3000 barrels of purified middlings at the price of $6.40 per barrel. The contract contained the tax clause set out in note4.

Under a contract5 dated June 20, 1935, the Milling Company sold and agreed to deliver to the Wheat Corporation 10,000 barrels of purified middlings at the price of $5.85 per barrel. The contract contained the tax clause set out in note6.

On July 17,-1935, the Milling Company commenced a suit in the District Court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Lash's Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Heckman & Co. v. I. S. Dawes & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Security Flour Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  2. United States v. American Packing & Provision Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  3. United States v. Kansas Flour Mills Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Security Flour Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  5. United States v. Hagan & Cushing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API