Moundridge Milling Co. v. Cream of Wheat Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Under a contract1 dated January 30, 1935, the Moundridge Milling Company2 sold and agreed to deliver to the Cream of Wheat Corporation3 3000 barrels of purified middlings at the price of $6.40 per barrel. The contract contained the tax clause set out in note4.
Under a contract5 dated June 20, 1935, the Milling Company sold and agreed to deliver to the Wheat Corporation 10,000 barrels of purified middlings at the price of $5.85 per barrel. The contract contained the tax clause set out in note6.
On July 17,-1935, the Milling Company commenced a suit in the District Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Lash's Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Heckman & Co. v. I. S. Dawes & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Security Flour Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. American Packing & Provision Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. Kansas Flour Mills Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Security Flour Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. Hagan & Cushing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.