Legal Opinion

Heckman & Co. v. I. S. Dawes & Son Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 5, 1926No. 4310PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District, dismissing plaintiff’s bill, seeking reT covery of money alleged to have been paid under a mistake of law. The averments of the bill are in substance as follows: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue promulgated a regulation construing section 628 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1116 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6161%d]) as imposing upon manufacturers of eider a tax equal to 10 per cent, of the price for which sold. As such a manufacturer, defendant paid to the United States 10 per cent, of the price for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lamborn v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Chesebrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Jordan v. StevensSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863
  4. Detroit Edison Co. v. Wyatt Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
  5. Casey v. Sterling Cider Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Wourdack v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. G. S. Johnson Co. v. N. Sauer Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Johnson v. Igleheart Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  5. State v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API