Heckman & Co. v. I. S. Dawes & Son Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District, dismissing plaintiff’s bill, seeking reT covery of money alleged to have been paid under a mistake of law. The averments of the bill are in substance as follows: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue promulgated a regulation construing section 628 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1116 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6161%d]) as imposing upon manufacturers of eider a tax equal to 10 per cent, of the price for which sold. As such a manufacturer, defendant paid to the United States 10 per cent, of the price for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lamborn v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Chesebrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Jordan v. StevensSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Wyatt Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
- Casey v. Sterling Cider Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Pure Oil Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Wourdack v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- G. S. Johnson Co. v. N. Sauer Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Johnson v. Igleheart Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- State v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.