Legal Opinion
United States v. Kansas Flour Mills Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 8, 1941No. 45PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
Between May, 1935, and January 6, 1936, the respondent entered into eight contracts for the sale of flour to the United States. Deliveries were duly made and the contract price was paid.
Each of the eight contracts provided: .
“Prices set forth herein include any Federal tax heretofore imposed by the Congress which is applicable to the material purchased under this contract. If any sales tax, processing tax, adjustment charge or other taxes or charges are imposed or changed by the Congress after the date set for the opening of the bid upon which this contract is based and made applicable…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. FontenotSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- G. S. Johnson Co. v. N. Sauer Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Sparks Milling Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- United States v. Cowden Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Standard Rice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Callaway v. AxtellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Pedro A. Pizá, Inc. v. Tribunal de ContribucionesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
- Standard Rice Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
- Suncook Mills v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.