Legal Opinion

State v. YAI BOL

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 9, 2011No. 2010-009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Defendant Yai Bol appeals from his conviction for giving false information to a police officer and possession of cocaine. He argues that the trial court erred by preventing his counsel from using a peremptory challenge to strike a black member of the jury pool. He claims that this error should result in a new trial. We agree and reverse and remand.

¶ 2. Defendant was arrested after police were called to the scene of a reported fight in progress. An officer asked defendant if he had any identification and to identify himself. He provided the officer with someone else’s identification…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Rivera v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. JonasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. RobertsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. Noel, H., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. Noel, H., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API