Legal Opinion

Johnson v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 13, 2005No. 04-6964PublishedCited by 820 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The Supreme Court of California and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit have provided conflicting answers to the following question: “Whether to establish a prima facie case under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79 (1986), the objector must show that it is more likely than not that the other party’s peremptory challenges, if unexplained, were based on impermissible group bias?” Pet. for Cert. i. Because both of those courts regularly review the validity of convictions obtained in California criminal trials, respondent, the State of California, agreed to petitioner’s request…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by820 opinions

  1. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. Rice v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

815 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API