Legal Opinion

American Economy Insurance v. Liggett

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1981No. 3-780A215PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Judge.

In this case the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of a policy holder for a fire loss claim although there was an issue of fact concerning whether the claimant’s deceased husband may have caused the fire. Stressing that the claimant’s innocence of any complicity was stipulated by the parties, Judge Beamer analyzed the reasons supporting the competing rules of law on the question thus presented. We agree with his conclusion and adopt his opinion as the decision of this court:

“This dispute is over the proceeds of a homeowners insurance policy following a fire loss at…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  4. Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. American States Insurance Co. v. KigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Krupp v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Asbury v. Indiana Union Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API