State v. Ahmed
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
On appeal from his convictions of third-degree assault and second-degree criminal sexual conduct, appellant contends that (1) the district court abused its discretion in admitting the out-of-court statement of the child victim without considering the credibility of the testifying witness; (2) the state did not prove that prohibited sexual contact occurred; and (3) the jury was improperly instructed on the “particular cruelty” aggravating factor. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the child’s statement and there is sufficient evidentiary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Tua Mene Lebie Bakor v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Mohamed Adel AlwanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Tyrone Joseph MohrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014