Legal Opinion

State v. Pendexter

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 26, 1985PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

After a jury trial in Superior Court (Aroostook County), the Defendant, Gary Pendexter, was convicted of unauthorized use of property. (17-A M.R.S.A. § 360 (1983)). On appeal, the Defendant contends that the presiding justice had not responded appropriately to what the Defendant asserted was an improper comment by the prosecutor in summation, and he further challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him. Finding no error, we deny the appeal.

In his closing argument the prosecutor referred to a witness as “an admitted thief and an admitted liar.” The Defendant argues…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ReillySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. State v. McKenneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. State v. ClarkeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. DolloffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. State v. LockhartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  3. State v. HarnishSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. State v. AshleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. State of Maine v. Carter McBreairtySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API