Legal Opinion
Fresh Grown Preserve Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 16, 1942No. 51PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
This petition, under 15 U.S.C.A. § 45(c), puts in issue for purposes of review an order made by the Federal Trade Commission requiring the petitioners to cease and desist from labelling, marking or advertising their products as “preserves,” or “pure preserves” unless they contain a fruit content in proportion to sugar of at least 45 to 55 by weight; from representing that their products, not having such proportions, are “preserves” or “pure preserves”; and from representing that their products are composed of named fruits when in fact they contain a mixture of fruits…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Fashion Originators Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Royal Baking Powder Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Justin Haynes & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Fioret Sales Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- E. F. Drew & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Alberty v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Houbigant, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.