Legal Opinion
Alberty v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 20, 1950No. 9843_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition to review an order of the Federal Trade Commission. Petitioners are engaged in selling food and drug products. They were charged by the Commission with disseminating false advertisements amounting to unfair and deceptive acts or practices in commerce. Four products are involved in this petition. They are Oxorin Tablets, Zen, Vitamin A Shark Liver Oil, and Alberty’s Phospho B. After hearing, the Commission made detailed findings and issued a cease and desist order. Petitioners contest the validity of two clauses contained in parts of the order.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fresh Grown Preserve Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Warner-Lambert Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Keele Hair & Scalp Specialists, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Simeon Management Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.