Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Carrillo

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1997No. 95CA0299Published

1Concurrence

Judge ROTHENBERG,

specially concurring.

Although I conclude there was no gross abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of defendant’s challenge to a potential juror, I view this one ruling as being precipitously close to requiring reversal. I write separately because denials of for-cause challenges to prospective jurors in criminal cases are becoming a recurring, and perhaps avoidable, appellate issue.

Recently, another divided panel of this court addressed a similar situation. There, the trial court, over the objection of both counsel, denied defendant’s challenge for cause tó another…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles Edward McIntyreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. People v. MacRanderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Morgan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Beeman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. People v. VelozColorado Court of Appeals · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API