Legal Opinion

Lambeth v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 2007No. 2-04-140-CRPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING EN BANC

JOHN CAYCE, Chief Justice.

Following the issuance of our original opinion, appellant Mickel Wayne Lambeth, Jr. filed a motion for en banc rehearing. Appellant’s motion for en banc rehearing is granted. We withdraw our opinion and judgment of November 23, 2005, and substitute the following in their place.

I. Introduction

Appellant appeals his conviction for possession of less than two ounces of marijuana. In two issues, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. In his first issue, appellant argues that the troopers wrongfully detained…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Parker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Danny Eugene Ivie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
  4. HAMAL v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  5. Mitchell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API