Johnson v. Lighthouse
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from, Superior Court, Whatcom, Comity.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J.
— Eespondents move to dismiss the .appeal because of appellants’ failure to serve one of the defendants in the action, the Pacific Loan, Trust & Investment Company, which appeared in the action, with notice of the appeal. The point is well taken, and must be sustained. Code Proc., § 1406; National Bank v. Central Hotel Co., 4 Wash. 642 (30 Pac. 671); Traders’ Bank v. Bokien, 5 Wash. 777 (32 Pac. 744).
There- is also another ground of dismissal which we find from the record, and which existed when the appeal was taken. This was an action to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Traders' Bank v. BokienWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Bellingham Bay National Bank v. Central Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lough v. John Davis & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Fairfield v. BinnianWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Cornell University v. Denny Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Casey v. OakesWashington Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.