Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Lighthouse

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1894No. 1027PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court, Whatcom, Comity.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— Eespondents move to dismiss the .appeal because of appellants’ failure to serve one of the defendants in the action, the Pacific Loan, Trust & Investment Company, which appeared in the action, with notice of the appeal. The point is well taken, and must be sustained. Code Proc., § 1406; National Bank v. Central Hotel Co., 4 Wash. 642 (30 Pac. 671); Traders’ Bank v. Bokien, 5 Wash. 777 (32 Pac. 744).

There- is also another ground of dismissal which we find from the record, and which existed when the appeal was taken. This was an action to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Traders' Bank v. BokienWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Bellingham Bay National Bank v. Central Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lough v. John Davis & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Fairfield v. BinnianWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cornell University v. Denny Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Casey v. OakesWashington Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API