Legal Opinion

Traders' Bank v. Bokien

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1893No. 687PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff against several defendants. Judgment was duly rendered therein, from which one of the defendants has sought to appeal to this court. The notice of appeal given by said defendant was directed to and served upon the plaintiff and all the defendants excepting Benjamin A. Chilberg. As to this defendant the notice was entirely silent, and there is no proof in the record that it was ever served upon him or his attorney. For the reason that said defendant Chilberg was not made a party to the appeal a motion…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Johnson v. Puritan Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Deno v. Standard Furniture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Commercial National Bank of Ogden v. United States Savings, Loan & Building Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Cornell University v. Denny Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API