Legal Opinion

Fairfield v. Binnian

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1895No. 1953PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. J. W. Langley, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*2The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

It is sufficient to state for the purposes of this opinion that, in the action to restrain the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage brought by respondents John Fairfield and Flora E. Fairfield against Henry Binnian—James H. Woolery being made a party defendant—one James P. Oberteuffer obtained an order from the court allowing him to intervene in the action, and on the same day served on the appellants and on the respondents his complaint in intervention, in which he asked for a money judgment against these respondents, and also for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howard v. ShawWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Johnson v. LighthouseWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lough v. John Davis & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Gherardi v. Trenton Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. A. Kaplen & Son, Ltd. v. Housing Authority of PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Cornell University v. Denny Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API