Fairfield v. Binnian
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. J. W. Langley, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*2The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, J.
It is sufficient to state for the purposes of this opinion that, in the action to restrain the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage brought by respondents John Fairfield and Flora E. Fairfield against Henry Binnian—James H. Woolery being made a party defendant—one James P. Oberteuffer obtained an order from the court allowing him to intervene in the action, and on the same day served on the appellants and on the respondents his complaint in intervention, in which he asked for a money judgment against these respondents, and also for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Howard v. ShawWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Johnson v. LighthouseWashington Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lough v. John Davis & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Gherardi v. Trenton Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- A. Kaplen & Son, Ltd. v. Housing Authority of PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Cornell University v. Denny Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.