Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. Weyerhaeuser Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1984No. 832SC106PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendants first contend that the trial court erred in not certifying for trial by jury issues of fact arising out of the title examiner’s report. This contention is based on the language of G.S. 43-ll(e), which provides in part:

Any of the parties to the proceeding may, within 20 days after such report is filed, file exceptions, either to the conclusions of law or fact. Whereupon the clerk shall transmit the record to the judge of the superior court for his determination thereof; such judge may on his own motion certify any issue of fact arising upon any such exceptions to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Perry v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Wooten v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drummond v. CordellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Skamarak v. SkamarakCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Drummond v. CordellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API