Drummond v. Cordell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
The opinion of this Court filed 15 January 1985 is hereby superseded by the following opinion.
We hold the trial court erred in concluding that the small claims judgment was void. That judgment could not be collaterally attacked, and it is proper on its face. Powell v. Turpin, 224 N.C. 67, 29 S.E. 2d 26 (1944). Since the small claims judgment was proper, it authorized defendant-lienor to sell the automobile pursuant to G.S. 44A-4. Because the lienor had authority to sell the vehicle to collect storage charges, plaintiff has no claim for conversion, since conversion is “an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gallimore v. SinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Lail Ex Rel. Lail v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Wilkinson v. Weyerhaeuser Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ottway Burton, PA v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Rowell v. North Carolina Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- United States v. WhedbeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Vaseleniuck Engine Development, LLC v. Sabertooth Motorcycles, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- AT&T Family Federal Credit Union v. Beaty Wrecker Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.