State v. Schrack
Montana Supreme Court
Harvey Schrack and George Rogers were convicted of larceny, and appeal from the judgment of conviction, and from the orders denying their motion' for a new trial.
Read the full summary
Harvey Schrack and George Rogers were convicted of larceny, and appeal from the judgment of conviction, and from the orders denying their motion' for a new trial. In support of the contention that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict, we cite the following eases: State v. Keeland, 39 Mont. 506, 104 Pac. 513; State v. Mullins, 55 Mont. 95, 173 Pac. 788; Territory v. Doyle, 7 Mont. 245, 14 Pac. 671; State v. Sullivan, 9 Mont. 174, 22 Pac. 1083; State v. Willette, 46 Mont. 326, 127 Pac. 1013; State v. Brower, 55 Mont. 349, 177 Pae. 241; Sanders v. State, 167 Ala. 85, 28 L. R. A.…
1Opinion of the Court
MR. COMMISSIONER SPENCER
prepared the opinion for the court.
Defendants were charged in the district court of Flathead county with the larceny of one steer calf, the property of A. M. Moore. Trial was had and defendants convicted. Motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial were denied-Defendants appeal from the adverse order in each instance and from the judgment.
It appears from the evidence that about June 29, 1917, the defendants went through Niarada, in Flathead county, traveling north through the Little Bitter Root Canyon, upon a fishing excursion. They were seen going and returning.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. McCarthyMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. SlothowerMontana Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. SieffMontana Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. WoodsMontana Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. BrowerMontana Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RiggsMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. HoodMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. ArnoldMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. CooperMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. GilbertMontana Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.