Legal Opinion

State v. Hood

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1931No. 6,781PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Defendant has appealed from a judgment of conviction of the crime of unlawful possession of cocaine hydrochloride and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Numerous assignments of error are specified, but in the view that we take of the case only one—the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the conviction, raised by defendant on motion for a directed verdict—need be considered.

The evidence shows that two federal narcotic agents, Williams and Welliver, in company with MeNabb and Wood, and James Brennan, who was jointly charged with defendant, entered a one-story frame house at 35…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RiggsMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. CooperMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. KononMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. SchrackMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. KerriganMontana Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. EbelMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Glantz v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. Le DucMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Rupard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  5. State v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API