Legal Opinion

State v. Woods

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1917No. 4,026PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fallon, County; Daniel 8. O’Eern, Judge. Denver and Oscar Woods were convicted of grand larceny, and appeal from the judgments of conviction, and from an order denying their motions for new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

The defendants were tried jointly and convicted of the crime of grand larceny, in the district court of Fallon county. The *194court pronounced separate judgments upon them, sentencing each of them to undergo a term of imprisonment in the state prison. They have appealed from the judgments and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. They challenge the integrity of the judgments upon the single ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence: First, in that, taken as a whole, it does not disclose the commission of a larceny; and, second, that, though this be conceded, it does not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State v. SuitorMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. KeelandMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. ChevignyMontana Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RiggsMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. SlothowerMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. FrancisMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. State v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State v. GomezMontana Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API