Legal Opinion

New York & Queens Gas Co. v. Prendergast

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 16, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINSLOW, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the plaintiff for a permanent injunction, based upon the report and opinion of the special master.

This action is brought by the plaintiff for an adjudication as to the constitutionality of chapter 898 and chapter 899 of the Laws of New York of 1923, relating to the price and quality of gas furnished by the plaintiff, and for a permanent injunction restraining the enforcement of these statutes. The motion brings on for final hearing in this court the report filed herein by the special master heretofore appointed to consider the questions of law…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Trustees of the Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Mobile Gas Co. v. PattersonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1923
  4. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. NewtonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  5. Newton, Atty. Gen. Of State of New York v. New York & Queens Gas CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
  3. Brooklyn Borough Gas Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926
  4. New York Telephone Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  5. Consolidated Gas Co. of New York v. PrendergastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API