Legal Opinion

Mobile Gas Co. v. Patterson

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided October 31, 1923PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CFAYTON, District Judge.

The length and strenuosity of this litigation demonstrates its importance and requires a careful consideration of the following questions:

"(1) What is the reasonable value of the properties of the Mobile Gas Company which are used and useful in the public s'ervice?(2) To what extent, if any, is the foregoing inquiry controlled by contract between the parties ?(3) Is the tariff of rates which was fixed by the Alabama Public Service Commission in its order cf July 24. 1922, confiscator)' ?(4) Did the Commission comply-with the condition imposed by the statute as…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United Rs. & Elec. Co. of Baltimore v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'n v. DouglasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API