Legal Opinion

Brooklyn Borough Gas Co. v. Prendergast

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 13, 1926No. E-1275PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The ■special master appointed in this suit has reported that the New York state statute (chapter 899 of the Laws of 1923) which prohibits the plaintiff, as a public utilities corporation engaged in furnishing gas to inhabitants of the borough of Brooklyn, city of New York, from making a charge in excess of $1 per thousand cubic feet and requiring gas furnished to have a standard of not less than 650 British thermal units, is unconstitutional as to this plaintiff because it is confiscatory. The District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York have held…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
  3. Ottinger v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. New York & Richmond Gas Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
  5. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Pac. T. T. Co. v. D.P.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1932
  4. Application of Diamond State Tel. Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1954
  5. New York Telephone Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API