Bando v. Clure Bros. Furniture
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Chief Justice.
John A. Bando (Bando) appeals from the denial of his claim for worker’s compensation benefits, arguing that the Office of Administrative Hearings was without jurisdiction because his case was medically contested. We disagree. The Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Division, pursuant to its rule defining medically contested cases, properly determined that Bando’s claim did not warrant medical commission review. In addition, we are satisfied that the record supports the hearing examiner’s determination that Bando did not clearly prove that he suffered his hernia while working…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- LP v. Natrona County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Pederson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Casper Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Commission of the Department of EmploymentWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Clark v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- MB v. Laramie County Department of Family Services Ex Rel. LBWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kenyon v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Decker v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Medical CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Anastos v. General Chemical Soda AshWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Rodgers v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Joyner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.