Legal Opinion
Crawley v. Munson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON. Act. J.
The issue presented is by a demurrer to the writ.
“When the right to require the performance of the act is clear, and it is apparent that no valid excuses can be given for not performing it, a peremptory mandamus shall be allowed in the first instance; in all other cases, the alternative writ shall be first issued”: § 617, O. L.”
It is argued that the writ does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the court below so held. The writ itself ought to contain every material fact alleged in the petition relied upon by the plaintiff to compel the defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elliott v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. Malheur County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Mackin v. Portland Gas Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Paine v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bethke v. BainOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Johnson v. CRADDOCKOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Olds v. KirkpatrickOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- United States v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- International Transportation Equipment Lessors, Inc. v. BohannonOregon Supreme Court · 1969