Legal Opinion

In re Petition for Naturalization as a Citizen of Pui Lan Yee

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 22, 1957No. 8407PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge.

The Immigration and Naturalization Service, by Bruce G. Barber, District Director, hereinafter referred to as movant, has moved this Court, under the provisions of Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to vacate its order of May 7, 1956, admitting Pui Lan Yee, also known as Yee Pui Lan, and Virginia Yee, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, to United States citizenship. It is the contention of the movant Director that a proceeding of this nature is proper under the provisions of § 1451 (j), Title 8 U.S.C.A. Counsel for petitioner, Mrs. Yee, has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Pacific Contact Laboratories, Inc. v. Solex Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. Kahle v. Amtorg Trading Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
  4. In re Highwood Cemetery Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society Ltd. v. GlasserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. HopkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Laurel Bank and Trust Co. v. BurnsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Brown v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  4. Corporate Teledata, Inc. v. SullivanMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003
  5. James Lewis Jackson v. John N. JewellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API