Legal Opinion
Kahle v. Amtorg Trading Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 30, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 11857PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is a civil action in which the plaintiffs sought to recover the purchase price of a certain machine which they agreed to manufacture for and deliver to the defendant. The action was heretofore before this Court on two motions: a motion for judgment on the pleadings, filed by the plaintiffs under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 12(c), 28 U.S.C.A., and a motion for summary judgment, filed by the defendant under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A. The former was supported by the affidavit of one of the plaintiffs and the exhibits…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Greenspahn v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Kwasizur v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Von Wedel v. McGrathDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
- Kahle v. Amtorg Trading Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
3Cited by24 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,670 John Bershad v. Bernard P. McDonough and Cudahy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Pullin v. City of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Torockio v. Chamberlain Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Sears, Sucsy & Co. v. Insurance Company of No. Amer.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Delzona Corp. v. SacksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.